The next due date should be calculated using this date.The date of signing the certificate of release to service (CRS) should be considered to be the date of the accomplishment.Please refer also to ‘AMC2 ML.A.302’ (EASA Form AMP), ‘GM1 ML.A.302’ and ‘AMC1 ML.A.302(d)’ (content of MIP). In accordance with ML.A.302 and in particular ML.A.302(c)(4), the AMP, declared or approved, shall in all cases include all the mandatory maintenance/continuing airworthiness requirements, such as repetitive Airworthiness Directives or the Airworthiness Limitation Section (ALS). The competent authority shall be informed in the case where the ARS does not agree with the measures taken to amend the AMP. If during the airworthiness review it is observed that there are discrepancies on the aircraft linked to deficiencies in the content of the aircraft maintenance programme, the AMP must be amended. For approved AMP, the review can be done either by the Airworthiness Review Staff (ARS) during the airworthiness review or by the CAMO itself. For declared AMP, this review should be done by the person who performs the airworthiness review during its accomplishment (see AMC1 ML.A.302(c)(9)). In addition, the AMP shall be reviewed annually. A clear overview of the different options for the development (including the source of information and potential customisation) and approval of such an AMP is provided by ‘GM1 ML.A.201’, ‘GM2 ML.A.302’. In both scenarios though (AMP declared by owner or approved by CAMO/CAO), when the AMP is not based on the MIP, the deviations to the applicable ICA shall not result in a less restrictive task than the corresponding MIP task. Deviations from the applicable scheduled maintenance recommendations (including ICA if the AMP is not based on the MIP) should be justified and properly recorded. If the aircraft is managed by a CAMO or CAO, such organisation should ‘approve’ the AMP.
300 MAMP TO AMP FULL
Except for the mandatory requirements (see also remark below) the owner may decide, under his/her full responsibility, to deviate from the applicable scheduled maintenance recommendations (including ICA if the AMP is not based on the MIP) without the need to justify such deviation(s) (see GM1 ML.A.302). Such declared AMP does not need to be sent to the competent authority. The owner, when she/he has not contracted the continuing airworthiness management to a CAMO or CAO, should ‘declare’ the AMP assuming responsibility for its content. Certification of products and organisationsįor aircraft complying with Part-ML (refer to Article 3(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014, the AMP should be based either on the applicable ICA or on the Minimum Inspection Programme (MIP) defined in ML.A.302(d).Certification Support for Validation (CSV).Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) to an Airworthiness Directive (AD).Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) and Alternative Means of Compliance (AltMoC).Drones with class identification label C0-C6.Provisions applicable to both ‘open’ and ’specific’ category.Airspace Usage requirements – DLS/CPDLC.Airspace Usage Requirement (ACAS II v7.1).Flight Simulation Training Devices (FSTD).
Training and licensing of maintenance personnel.Aircraft maintenance and continuing airworthiness.Design certificates and design organisation approvals.Development of Safety Promotion Content.Aviation training on innovative domains.
0 kommentar(er)
